Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins

To: Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
From: "Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:39:20 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "<stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100913033338.6E1D18BFFDC@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <B5A84A27-852C-437C-B568-465D194A34A0@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C8BC4E5.7060108@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <6DEE582E17F440C68E8D817C2710C144@KLENDATHU> <1E4D16D0-AB19-4E5F-8B7C-6F5B6378977D@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100912140049.213908BFD34@xxxxxxxxx> <4C8D400D.70602@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <A7A3B533D00F40FF9D52F62391DEB7B2@KLENDATHU> <20100913005303.A691C8BFFCA@xxxxxxxxx> <4C8D8635.6000603@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <9178E5FD-14DD-4172-947E-BD04B43D7EF6@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100913033338.6E1D18BFFDC@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AQHLUvT1z2bUSd9kc0i9qEs3U1KrD5MQDb6A
Thread-topic: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins

Dan,

On Sep 12, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote:
> 
> 	BTW George, your M0022.01.Amend001.01 nomenclature
> 	sounds as good as any.  But let me suggest slightly
> 	shortening it to M0022.01.A001.01 for two reasons.
Good suggestion.

George

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- motion tabled, amendment M0022.01.A001.01 discussion begins
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott

References:
- Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
  - From: John Pryce
- Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
  - From: Nate Hayes
- Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
  - From: John Pryce
- Re: Do I have a second? Re: Motion on decoration bit to verify continuity
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Nate Hayes
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Corliss, George
- Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
  - From: Dan Zuras Intervals

Prev by Date: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- motion tabled, amendment discussion begins
Next by Date: Basenote drift to the value of mid-rad forms...
Previous by thread: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
Next by thread: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- motion tabled, amendment M0022.01.A001.01 discussion begins
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread